MAYVILLE, N.Y. — Salman Rushdie described in graphic detail Tuesday the frenzied moments in 2022 when a masked man rushed at him on a stage in western New York and repeatedly slashed him with a knife, leaving him with terrible injuries and fearful he would die.
Rushdie took the stand during the second day of testimony at the trial of Hadi Matar, 27, who has pleaded not guilty to attempted murder and assault in the attack that also wounded another man. It was the first time since the stabbing that the 77-year-old author found himself in the same room as the man accused of trying to kill him.
Rushdie recalled feeling “a sense of great pain and shock, and aware of the fact that there was an enormous quantity of blood that I was lying in” after the attack.
“It occurred to me that I was dying. That was my predominant thought,” he said, adding that the people who subdued his assailant likely saved his life.
As he recounted the attack, his wife, Rachel Eliza Griffiths, cried from her seat in the courtroom’s second row.
“I only saw him at the last minute,” Rushdie said of the man who rushed across the stage at the Chautauqua Institution and stabbed him repeatedly with a 10-inch blade.
“I was aware of someone wearing black clothes, or dark clothes and a black face mask. I was very struck by his eyes, which were dark and seemed very ferocious.”
Rushdie said he first thought his knife-wielding attacker was striking him with a fist.
“But I saw a large quantity of blood pouring onto my clothes,” he said. “He was hitting me repeatedly. Hitting and slashing.”
Rushdie said he was struck again in his chest and torso and stabbed in his chest as he struggled to get away.
“I was very badly injured. I couldn’t stand up any more. I fell down,” he said.
Rushdie was blinded in one eye in the attack.
He spent 17 days at a Pennsylvania hospital and more than three weeks at a New York City rehabilitation center, where he had to re-learn basic skills like squeezing toothpaste from a tube. He detailed his months of recovery in a memoir released last year.
“I think I’m not quite at 100%. I think I’ve substantially recovered but it’s probably 75 to 80%,” Rushdie testified. “I’m not as energetic as I used to be. I’m not as physically strong as I used to be.”
Matar, who was seated about 20 feet away from Rushdie in the courtroom, often looked down during his testimony.
Lynn Schaffer, a public defender representing Matar, began the cross examination by asking the Booker Prize-winning author about his career. The questioning was brief, low-key and for a moment friendly. She asked Rushdie if he would be surprised that ‘Bridget Jones’s Diary,” in which he makes a cameo, was her favorite movie.
“I am surprised,” Rushdie said, joking that it was his “most important work.”
The only hint at a possible defense strategy was a question about whether trauma can affect memories.
Rushdie acknowledged that he has a false memory, that he thought he stood up when he saw the attacker approaching, but that wasn’t true.
She then challenged him to remember how many times he was struck.
“I wasn’t counting at the time. I was otherwise occupied. But afterward I could see them on my body. I didn’t need to be told by anybody.”
No one asked Rushdie to identify his attacker in court and he declined to be interviewed as he left the courthouse after about an hour of testimony.
Security was notably tighter ahead of Rushdie’s appearance, with several law enforcement vehicles parked outside the courthouse.
On Monday, staffers at the Chautauqua Institution — the nonprofit art and education center where the attack happened about 75 miles south of Buffalo — testified about the attack.
The trial is expected to last up to two weeks.
Jurors are unlikely to hear about a fatwa issued by the late Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini calling for Rushdie’s death, according to District Attorney Jason Schmidt. Rushdie, the author of “Midnight’s Children” and “Victory City,” spent years in hiding after Khomeini announced the fatwa in 1989 following publication of the novel “The Satanic Verses,” which some Muslims consider blasphemous.
Schmidt has said discussing Matar’s motive will be unnecessary in the state trial, given the attack was seen by a live audience that was expecting to hear Rushdie present a lecture on keeping writers safe.
“This is not a case of mistaken identity,” Schmidt said during opening statements Monday. “Mr. Matar is the person who attacked Mr. Rushdie without provocation.”
Schaffer, the defense lawyer, told jurors that the case is not as straightforward as prosecutors have made it out to be.
“The elements of the crime are more than `something really bad happened’ — they’re more defined,” Schaffer said. “Something bad did happen, something very bad did happen, but the district attorney has to prove much more than that.”
In a separate indictment, federal authorities allege Matar was driven to act by a terrorist organization’s 2006 endorsement of the fatwa. A later trial on federal terrorism charges will be scheduled in U.S. District Court in Buffalo.
